Rangel v. Reynolds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing the plaintiffs’ claim that social worker submitted false and misleading courtroom testimony and false documentation to the court because social worker was entitled to absolute immunity for those actions under Millspaugh
• dismissing the plaintiffs’ claim that social worker submitted false and misleading courtroom testimony and false documentation to the court because the social worker was entitled to absolute immunity for those actions under Millspaugh

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).