Raney v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[s]tanding on its own, the vouching would likely not rise to the level of reversible error”
• noting that an attorney should not assert a personal knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as a witness
• noting that an attorney should not assert personal knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as a witness
• stating that error in admission of evidence is harmless if probable impact on the jury is sufficiently minor so as not to affect the defendant’s substantial rights
• finding it inappropriate for a prosecutor to make an argument which takes the form of personally vouching for a witness
• finding charging information was sufficiently specific where alleged that a single act of molestation happened during a five-year period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).