Skip to main content
· 2/4/1994

Randy—The Salon v. New York State Division of Human Rights

Citations

  • 201 A.D.2d 901
  • 607 N.Y.S.2d 811

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing and applying the principle of construing wage orders to protect employees
  • treating a required call to an employer as “reporting for work” under Wage Order 7 and not as standby work that is not subject to the reporting pay requirements of Wage Order 7
  • “[A]n omission [of mention of telephonic reporting in Wage Order 7] is not surprising because neither the practice of on-call scheduling nor the cell phone technology that makes such scheduling possible existed when the IWC adopted the reporting time pay requirement in the 1940s.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.