· 2/4/1994
Randy—The Salon v. New York State Division of Human Rights
Citations
- 201 A.D.2d 901
- 607 N.Y.S.2d 811
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing and applying the principle of construing wage orders to protect employees
- treating a required call to an employer as “reporting for work” under Wage Order 7 and not as standby work that is not subject to the reporting pay requirements of Wage Order 7
- “[A]n omission [of mention of telephonic reporting in Wage Order 7] is not surprising because neither the practice of on-call scheduling nor the cell phone technology that makes such scheduling possible existed when the IWC adopted the reporting time pay requirement in the 1940s.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.