· 5/4/1976
Randy's Studebaker Sales, Inc., D/B/A Randy's Datsun Sales v. Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A.
Citations
- 533 F.2d 510
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- willing to assume that increased parts and service income would cover increased overhead expenses
- customers’ responses to questionnaires evaluating quality of dealer’s service department admissible as reflective of customers’ then-existing state of mind
- reduce price competition and make certain capital expenditures or risk curtailed supply of automobiles
- expert’s calculation of lost profits not too speculative where expert had some evidentiary basis for decision to use 10-year period for projection
- award of variable net profits for a ten year period sustained
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holloway, Barrett, Doyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.