Skip to main content
· 6/23/2004

Randy Swix, Pamela Swix, Co-Conservators of the Estate of Aaron Ray Swix v. Daisy Manufacturing Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 373 F.3d 678
  • 64 Fed. R. Serv. 731
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 12428
  • 2004 WL 1403256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding “that the fact that a product may be a ‘simple tool’ is not dispositive in a design defect case— the obviousness of a danger is merely one factor in the analysis of whether the risks are unreasonable in light of the foreseeable injuries”
  • finding \that the fact that a product may be a `simple tool' is not dispositive in a design defect case — the obviousness of a danger is merely one factor in the analysis of whether the risks are unreasonable in light of the foreseeable injuries\
  • finding “that the fact that a product may be a ‘simple tool’ is not dispositive in a design defect case–the obviousness of a danger is merely one factor in the analysis of whether the risks are unreasonable in light of the foreseeable injuries”
  • “[W]hether the danger associated with a simple tool is ‘open and obvious’ will determine whether a manufacturer owes a duty to warn[.]”
  • “[C]ourts have found hammers, knives, gas stoves, axes, buzz saws, propeller driven airplanes, trampolines and backyard pools to be simple tools.”
  • “ ‘[t]he focus is the typical user’s perception and knowledge’ [citation]” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Clay, Cudahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.