Randy Stokes v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that piercing the corporate veil is done to “impose liability”
• explaining the “general principle of corporate law” that a “parent corporation” is “not liable for the acts of its subsidiaries”
• discussing the appellee’s “voluntary commitment into a mental health institution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).