Randy Randall Rodgers v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “a mere showing of noncompliance with a court order, or even misconduct, is never sufficient alone to prove civil contempt” (citation omitted)
• explaining that “a mere showing of noncompliance with a court order, or even misconduct, is never sufficient alone to prove civil contempt” (citation omitted)
• failure to support each issue with discussion and analysis of pertinent authority hampers review and risks waiver
• “pro se status generally confers no special benefit upon an appellant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).