Skip to main content
· 6/16/2004

Randy Lamar Black v. United States

Citations

  • 373 F.3d 1140
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 11792
  • 2004 WL 1336415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that to satisfy the prejudice prong, a petitioner must 2 Heath v. Jones, 941 F.2d 1126, 1130 (11th Cir. 1991). show a reasonable probability that “but for the deficient performance, the outcome of the appeal would have been different”
  • noting that a reasonable attorney in the position of appellate counsel could have concluded a “hypothetical scenario” considered in a case “was simply dicta and did not provide binding authority”
  • “If the legal principle at issue is unsettled, . . . counsel will not have rendered deficient performance for an error in judgment.”
  • “[T]he holdings of a prior decision can reach only as far as the facts and circumstances presented to the Court in the case which produced the decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barkett, Kravitch, Forrester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.