Skip to main content
· 1/17/1997

Randy GREENAWALT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry L. STEWART, Et Al., Respondents-Appellees

Citations

  • 105 F.3d 1268
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 789
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 599
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a certificate of probable cause—a precursor to the COA—is necessary to obtain appellate review of an order denying a Rule 4(a)(6) motion in a habeas proceeding
  • noting that “a district court has discretion to stay a petition which it may validly consider on the merits,” and that the equities favoring a stay are greater for first petitions
  • rejecting an argument that the district court abused its discretion when it dismissed, rather than stayed, a mixed petition and holding that the district court was obligated under Rose to dismiss the mixed petition
  • rejecting an argument that the district court abused its discretion when it dismissed, rather than stayed, a mixed petition and holding that the district court was obligated under Rose to dismiss the mixed petition
  • finding the Neuschafer procedure to be dictum and inconsis- tent with Rose
  • section 2244 forecloses all successive-petition review of constitutional claims unrelated to guilt or innocence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace, Alarcon, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.