Randy E. Koons v. Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Aventis Integration Separation Plan, for Hrm Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding evidence that claimant used . company phone for personal calls and improperly used a confidential mailing list for solicitation
• finding evidence that claimant used company phone for personal calls and improperly used a confidential mailing list for solicitation
• finding no potential prejudice because there would be testimony from the author of the lost investigatory notes
• finding SPD controlling when master plan document was silent on issue
• affirming the district court’s decision to permit a witness to “testif[y] to what would have been contained in [a] document” that was before the ERISA plan administrator but was “lost . . . before [the] litigation began”
• affirming the district court’s decision to permit a witness to “testif[y] to what would have been contained in [a] document” that was before the ERISA plan administrator but was “lost . . . before [the] litigation began”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).