Randy E. Black v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court was not required to respond to defendant’s pro se request for a speedy trial when it was made after counsel was appointed
• holding that the trial court was not required to respond to defendant’s pro se request for a speedy trial when it was made after counsel was appointed
• noting once a defendant is represented by counsel, a trial court is not required to respond to a defendant’s pro se request

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).