Randy Cohen v. American Security Insurance, C

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the dismissal of a fraud claim because the complaint “allege[d] no facts or circumstances to support a finding of a duty to disclose” given that “[t]he parties operated at arm’s length”
• affirming the dismissal of an unjust enrichment claim based on breach of contract
• explaining “the traditional understanding of a kickback” is when “an agent, charged with acting for the benefit of a principal, accepts something of value from a third party in return for steering the principal’s business to the third party”
• “[a] claim for intentional interference with contract requires that the defendant intentionally and unjustly induced another to breach a contract with the plaintiff”
• “In Illinois recovery for unjust enrichment is unavailable where the conduct at issue is the subject of an express contract between the plaintiff and defendant.”
• “Of course, a party may plead claims in the alternative, i.e., she may plead a claim for breach of contract as well as unjust enrichment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).