Skip to main content
· 10/19/1870

Randolph's Appeal

Citations

  • 66 Pa. 178
  • 1871 Pa. LEXIS 13

Syllabus

<p>1. An original and cross bill are usually, but not necessarily, beard together.</p> <p>2. When both causes are at issue, the plaintiff in the cross-suit may have an order that they be heard together.</p> <p>3. A partner filed a bill against his fellow for an account, an answer was put in; before hearing, the defendant filed a cross-bill averring a settlement since filing the answer and praying the plaintiff might be compelled to perform it; the plaintiff put in an answer. Held, that the settlement being a preliminary question the court might order the cross-suit to be first heard.</p> <p>4.. There being no replication, it was not error to refuse to appoint an examiner.</p> <p>5. When a cause is heard on bill and answer, it is to be determined by the facts alleged in the bill and not denied in the answer; the court cannot look beyond the pleadings.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court’s review of DPW regulations is limited to a determination of their reasonableness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: New, Read, Shakswood, Thompson, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.