Randolph v. State Road Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that use of baseline risk assessment was not inconsistent with NCP
• finding common damages “where the defendant’s conduct resulted in a single injury”
• “[W]e ‘give deference to the EPA’s choice of response action and will not substitute our own judgment for that of the EPA.’ ”
• “It is fundamental that federal courts do not render advisory opinions and that they are limited to deciding issues in actual cases and controversies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).