Randolph v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing conviction because there was no evidence that the defendant was aware that his son would kill the victim, but where there was evidence of a subsequent agreement to fabricate a story to defend the son
• “[T]he very least that is required is encouragement of the commission of the offense by words or by agreement made prior to or contemporaneous with the act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cordova v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-09-25· cited 485×
• Gross v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-10-10· cited 195×
• George Cordova v. James A. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
  Fifth Circuit· 1988-02-17· cited 85×
• Navarro v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1989-12-06· cited 15×
• Campos v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1986-08-29· cited 15×
• Lopez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-02-19· cited 7×
• Gross, Jimmie
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-10-10
• Amber Marie Neuser v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2014-02-21

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Martinez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1952-06-25· cited 26×
• Everett v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1948-11-10· cited 19×
• Baldridge v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-12-01· cited 15×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-10-18· cited 11×