Skip to main content
· 2/25/2015

Randolph v. Staffmark

Citations

  • 2015 Ark. App. 135
  • 456 S.W.3d 389
  • 2015 Ark. App. LEXIS 150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding parties impliedly intended to contract when both employee and special employer “operated on the belief that Randolph would garner full-time employee benefits after he logged sufficient hours”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kenneth S. Hixson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.