Randolph v. Eastman Chemical Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff’s work was part of the regular business of the defendant and the issue of whether the defendant had the right of control is pretermitted
• stating that the Court “agree[d] with the reasoning of” Lambert
• considering the “entire picture” and viewing the shutdown “as one large project”
• same for electromagnetic-testing firm hired by chemical company to conduct testing at its plant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).