Skip to main content
· 6/23/2016

Randolph Michael Masturzo v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because the ALJ found Plaintiff’s foreign pension was not based on a totalization agreement the 42 U.S.C. § 415(a)(7)(A)(ii)[(II)] exception to the WEP does not apply
  • affirming agency’s decision to reduce a dual citizen’s Social Security benefits due to her receipt of Canada Pension Plan benefits
  • affirming agency’s decision to reduce a dual citizen’s Social Security benefits due to her receipt of Canada Pension Plan benefits
  • affirming agency’s decision to reduce a dual citizen’s Social Security benefits due to her receipt of Canada Pension Plan benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.