Rando v. California State Automobile Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing unlikelihood that anything but an “insubstantial amount of the liability premium” would be allocable to the non-owned vehicle coverage
• adding \our imprimatur to the uniform conclusion reached by courts in other jurisdictions disallowing stacking [of liability policies]\
• “[I]t defies reason to conclude that non-owned vehicle usage expands an insured’s liability coverage beyond that enjoyed while using an owned vehicle.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).