Randle v. Randle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellants’ motion to amend their answer and add a counterclaim, which was filed two and one-half years after their original answer and just prior to a hearing on a motion for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CENTRAL THERAPY CENTER, INC., a/a/o ANTONIO GARCIA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-05-24

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-11-09· cited 23×
• Corbett v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-06-09· cited 19×
• 2765 South Bayshore Drive Corp. v. Fred Howland, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-07-30· cited 5×