Randhawa v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that the third NOPSI category has “narrow parameters” and is not “triggered simply because the .. . proceeding involves a quintessentially state-law matter”
• “Both [cases] involved challenges to the process by which a State compels compliance with the judgments of its courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).