Randhawa v. Department of Homeland Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a proffered explanation was not “credible” because it was “internally inconsistent” and, ultimately, not “plausible”
• promotee was less qualified than four white plaintiffs and was promoted “over the[ir] heads ... in an unprecedented fashion”
• defendant promoted less qualified minority employee; use of subjective, rather than objective, criteria; internal and external pressure to favor minorities
• \A finding of constructive discharge requires a finding of intentional discrimination plus a finding of aggravating factors that suggest that the complainant was driven to quit.\
• “[N]either this court nor the Supreme Court has squarely addressed the issue whether minority status for purposes of a prima facie case could have a regional or local meaning”
• “[N]either this court nor the Supreme Court has squarely addressed the issue whether minority status for purposes of a prima facie case could have a regional or local meaning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).