Randell v. Ashe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the nonmoving party must produce ‘specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial,’ rather than resting upon the bald assertions of his pleadings”
• noting that “wholly speculative assertions” do not create a genuine issue of fact sufficient to withstand a motion for summary judgment
• applying same principle in Maryland law to differences between unemployment compensation and Title VII
• such proceedings while not having preclusive effect are relevant and worthy of consideration
• \Genuineness means that the evidence must create fair doubt; wholly speculative assertions will not suf- fice.\
• \Genuineness [of an issue for trial] means that the evidence must create fair doubt; wholly speculative assertions will not suffice\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).