Randall v. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that conclusory allegations will not suffice to allege an unjust enrichment claim
• describing the five elements necessary to make out a prima facie case for unjust enrichment
• dismissing unjust enrichment claim for lack of solicitation or inducement of benefit conferred
• unjust enrichment claim only viable “where it would be unfair for the recipient to retain” the benefits received
• “the doctrine of unjust enrichment was devised by equity to exact the return of . . . benefits received . . . without the contributor being repaid or compensated”
• first citing D.W.H. Painting Co., Inc. v. D.W. Ward Const. Co., Inc., 174 N.C. App. 327, 334, 620 S.E.2d 887, 893 (2005); and then quoting Booe v. Shadrick, 322 N.C. 567, 570, 369 S.E.2d 554, 556 (1988)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).