Randall v. State
Citations
- 82 Fla. 333
- 89 So. 875
Syllabus
<p>1. An indictment charging the accused with issuing a check upon a hank without having sufficient funds on deposit in such hank to pay the check, and having failed, within the time allowed after receipt of written notice of non-payment of such check, to make restitution by returning the property received therefor, which contains no allegation that the title or possession of the property given for the check was transferred upon the faith of the payment of the check, is fatally defective and a motion to quash such indictment should he granted.</p> <p>2. An indictment for an offense prescribed and defined by statute which omits to allege essential elements of the offense is defective and should be quashed upon motion specifically pointing out such defect.</p>
Judges: Browne, Ellis, Taylor, West, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-01-15· cited 26×
- Humphreys v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1879-06-15· cited 17×
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1896-06-15· cited 15×
- Ladd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1879-01-15· cited 13×
- Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1889-06-15· cited 13×
- Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1892-06-15· cited 13×
- Stevens v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1882-01-15· cited 11×
- Moulie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1896-01-15· cited 9×
- Vicente v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-10-28· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.