Randall v. Ganz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating 47 years ago that appellate arguments made without adequate specificity are “too indefinite for consideration by this Court.”
• “Where an appellant fails to assert his assignments of error with particularity and to support his position with sufficient authority, those assignments of error are too indefinite to be heard by the Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).