Randall v. Codman & Shurtleff, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that inmate and medical provider’s disagreement “over the preferred medication to treat [inmate’s] pain . . . does not support an Eighth Amendment claim”
• holding that plaintiff and defendant clearly disagreed over the preferred medication to treat Defendant’s pain but that “this difference of opinion does not support an Eighth Amendment violation.”
• holding that the claim that pain medication was ineffective did not establish deliberate indifference
• holding that an inmate only states a claim against a corporation performing traditional state functions when he alleges that his injury was caused by an action taken pursuant to some official policy or custom
• explaining that an inmate states a claim against a corporation performing traditional state functions when he alleges that his injury was caused by an action taken pursuant to some corporate policy or custom
• explaining that an inmate states a claim against a corporation performing traditional state functions when he alleges that his injury was caused by an action taken pursuant to some corporate policy or custom

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).