Randall S. Goulding v. Irving Feinglass and Irwin Solomon, Randall S. Goulding v. Thomas Dietz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff was not foreclosed from practicing in his profession and holding the plaintiff was not deprived of a liberty interest
• noting that the plaintiff had no claim for deprivation of his liberty interest in his job as a lawyer when defamatory statements by the government did not result in the revocation or suspension of his license

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).