Randall Kallinen and Paul Kubosh v. the City of Houston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting interpretation of Section 552.321 that would equate “information that is public with information that has been determined by the Attorney General to be public”
• “The parties agree that the only basis for the trial court’s jurisdiction is Section 552.321(a) of the PIA.”
• “The parties agree that the only basis for the trial court’s jurisdiction is Section 552.321(a) of the PIA.”
• a court should “not treat any statutory language as surplusage if possible”
• courts should avoid treating any statutory language as surplusage
• courts should avoid treating any statutory language as surplusage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).