Randall D. Hansen v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deferring under pre-Loper Bright framework to BIA’s interpretation of the INA “as allowing the government to exercise its discretion to parole a returning LPR into the United States for prosecution before satisfying its burden of proof”
• “the jurisdiction-stripping provision of 26 § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) applies to discretionary parole decisions under § 1182(d)(5)”
• \Aliens who have been lawfully admitted to the country generally receive more protection under immigration law than aliens who are seeking admission to the United States.\
• “[T]he jurisdiction-stripping provision of § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) applies to discretionary parole decisions under § 1182(d)(5).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).