Randall Buchanan v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “Congress established finality as an important goal of bankruptcy law”
• “Once the debt- or’s plan was confirmed, it became final under § 1327 and, absent a showing of fraud under § 1330(a), it could not be challenged. ...”
• “[I]f courts should relax provisions of the law and facilitate the assertion of old claims against discharged and reorganized debtors, the policy of the law would be defeated.”
• Creditor that failed to timely object to confirmation because of human error and a computer glitch cannot use Rule 9024 to circumvent the fraud requirement in § 1330
• “We adhere to all the relevant considerations—plain meaning, logic, case law and the policies underlying the Code—to hold that fraud is the only ground for relief available for revocation of a Chapter 13 confirmation order.”
• “We adhere to all the relevant considerations—plain meaning, logic, case law and the policies underlying the Code—to hold that fraud is the only ground for relief available for revocation of a Chapter 13 confirmation order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).