Skip to main content
· 11/30/1994

Federal Case

Citations

  • 42 F.3d 1185
  • 1995 A.M.C. 1763
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9054
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 16830
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 33551

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “the Supreme Court’s longstanding recognition that anchorage and mooring rules are best left to ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.