Skip to main content
· 9/15/2014

Randal Andersen v. Dhl Retirement Pension Plan

Citations

  • 766 F.3d 1205
  • 59 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1880
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17946
  • 2014 WL 4494859

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he government’s brief here is not entitled to deference pursuant to Chevron insofar as it interprets the statutory text directly.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Paez, Berzon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.