Rand v. Kipp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Ohio courts have historically applied the doctrine of primary assumption of the risk in sporting events
• noting that Ohio courts have historically applied the doctrine of primary assumption of the risk in sporting events
• merging implied assumption of risk with contributory negligence but expressly not merging express assumption of risk
• defense of implied assumption of risk is merged with defense of contributory negligence under R.C. 2315.19
• defense of implied assumption of risk is merged with defense of contributory negligence under R.C. 2315.19
• The “merger of assumption of risk with contributory negligence is not intended to merge that category of assumption of risk known as ‘express’ assumption of risk.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).