Skip to main content
· 7/29/1903

Rand, McNally & Co. v. Hartranft

Citations

  • 32 Wash. 378
  • 73 P. 401
  • 1903 Wash. LEXIS 431

Syllabus

<p>SCHOOLS-TEXT BOOKS-CONTRACT OE STATE BOARD — CHANGE OE COURSE OE STUDY.</p> <p>After the state board of education has adopted a series of text books, and prescribed a course of study, and made a contract with a publisher for the use of its books for five years in certain grades of the public schools, a county board will be enjoined from so changing the course of study for such grades that approximately twenty per cent, less students in the schools of a city will use such books during the year.</p> <p>SAME-REVIEWING STATE BOARD OE EDUCATION.</p> <p>The fact that such course of study was inadvisable is immaterial, and the courts cannot review the action of the state board except for fraud.</p> <p>SAME-STATUTES-IMPAIRING OBLIGATION OE CONTRACT.</p> <p>. The contract of the state board of education for the purchase of school books for a period of five years cannot be impaired by subsequent legislation.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Policy exclusions are generally pled as affirmative defenses.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hadley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.