· 12/28/1976
Rancho Palos Verdes Corporation, a Corporation v. City of Laguna Beach, a Municipal Corporation
Citations
- 547 F.2d 1092
- 7 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding land use planning is sensitive area of social policy
- distinguishing California law from Texas law and the Harris decision in holding that the district court should have retained jurisdiction following Pullman abstention
- holding land use planning is “a sensitive area of social policy”
- finding third factor met in case challenging land-use restrictions when recently enacted statutes that may provide plaintiff relief had not yet been interpreted by state courts
- abstention appropriate in case involving recently enacted “web of statutes” that attempts to “grapple with difficult land use problems”
- abstention appropriate in case involving recently enacted \web of statutes\ that attempts to \grapple with difficult land use problems\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hufstedler, Merrill, Renfrew
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.