Rancho De Calistoga v. City of Calistoga

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting “private as-applied takings” claim that was merely based on claim that “none of the purposes enumerated in [the challenged ordinance] apply here”
• private takings claim is not an independent cognizable claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).