Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Foundation v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that court need not remand if it finds “there is not substantial doubt as to whether the ITC would have reached the same conclusion” despite error
• upholding, based on the importance of context, Commission decision to treat interchangeability differently in its cumulation analysis than in its like product analysis
• holding agency actions become binding when practice produces reasonable reliance
• explaining that identification of an “agency practice” is predicated upon the existence of “a uniform and established procedure [] that would lead a party, in the absence of notification of a change, reasonably to expect adherence to the established practice or procedure”
• the court must determine whether there is a “rational basis in fact” for the agency’s determination
• court “cannot substitute its judgment. . . for that of the Commission,” but only “ascertain [s] whether there was a rational basis for the [Commission’s] determination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).