Skip to main content
· 8/2/1991

Ranch v. Farm Credit Bank of Omaha

Citations

  • 472 N.W.2d 704
  • 238 Neb. 814
  • 1991 Neb. LEXIS 292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an express contract requires a “definite proposal and an unconditional and absolute acceptance”
  • affirming, on different grounds, a district court’s order granting summary judgment
  • this court may affirm grant of summary judgment on any ground available to trial court, even if it is not same reasoning relied upon below
  • where acceptance differs from offer and is coupled with any condition that varies or adds to offer, it is not acceptance; rather, it is counteroffer
  • if a trial court arrives at the correct result even though it uses a reason different from that expressed by an appellate court, its judgment will still be upheld

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Grant, Fahrnbruch, Shanahan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.