Skip to main content
· 6/2/2022

Rance v. Watson

Citations

  • 168 Ohio St. 3d 246
  • 198 N.E.3d 65
  • 2022 Ohio 1822

Syllabus

Habeas corpus—Trial court's ordering of a psychological report as part of a presentence investigation does not call into question a defendant's competency to stand trial—Adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law—A trial court's subject-matter jurisdiction is not affected by a trial court's decision to order a presentence-investigation psychological report—Court of appeals' judgment dismissing complaint affirmed.

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.