Ranalli v. Rohm and Haas Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, “ [g] enerally, even claims of fraud by the employer are barred by the exclusivity provision of the Act...The only exception is where the employer knew its employee had a disease and withheld that information, causing an aggravation of the disease”
• “It is still more difficult to square Johnson’s interpretation with other provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. Section 502(b)(1) of the Code, for example, says that, if a ‘claim’ is ‘unenforceable,’ it will be disallowed.”
• “It is still more difficult to square Johnson’s interpretation with other provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. Section 502(b)(1) of the Code, for example, says that, if a ‘claim’ is ‘unenforceable,’ it will be disallowed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).