Ran Choeum v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the due process right to notice owed to a noncitizen permanent resident charged with removability is coextensive with the notice required by § 1229(a)(1)
• stating that “the INS may not substitute alternative grounds for deportation at this stage in the proceedings”
• noting that “it is not the institutional role of this court to serve as a fact-finding body on issues of first impression” in determining whether an alien had committed a crime for which he or she could be deported
• accepting the INS’s argument that the 1996 IIRIRA amendments were motivated by expansion of the list of aggravated felonies
• accepting INS's argument that 1996 amendments were fueled by expansion of the term \aggravated felony\
• accepting INS’s argument that 1996 amendments were fueled by expansion of the term “aggravated felony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).