Ramsum v. Woldridge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the case was not moot because the judgments for costs and disbursements were still in controversy and necessitated a determination on the merits
• “Because the judgments for costs and disbursements are still in controversy and depend on a determination on the merits, we conclude that these [FED] cases are not moot.”
• “Because the judgments for costs and disbursements are still in controversy and depend on a determination on the merits, we conclude that these [FED] cases are not moot.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).