Ramstad v. Lear Siegler Diversified Holdings Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the post-sale duty to warn because, among other reasons, the manufacturer had not undertaken a duty to warn
• no post-sale duty to warn where manufacturer “had notice of only a handful of other accidents”
• “Per diem arguments advise the jury to quantify pain and suffering by affixing an amount of damages to each hour or day and multiplying that amount by the number of hours or days left in a plaintiff’s life.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Esparza v. Skyreach Equipment, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-12-26· cited 29×
• Great N. Ins. Co. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-05-09· cited 9×
• Block v. Toyota Motor Corp.
  D. Minnesota· 2014-03-18· cited 7×
• Affiliated FM Insurance v. Neosho Construction Co.
  D. Kansas· 2000-04-06· cited 5×
• THS Northstar Associates v. WR Grace & Co.-Conn.
  D. Minnesota· 1994-04-01· cited 4×
• T.H.S. Northstar Associates v. W.R. Grace & Co.
  Eighth Circuit· 1995-09-25· cited 4×
• Gardner v. Brillion Iron Works, Inc.
  D. Minnesota· 2014-02-19· cited 4×
• Northstar Associates v. W.R. Grace And Company
  Eighth Circuit· 1995-11-21· cited 3×
• Robinson v. McNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE
  N.D. Illinois· 2009-11-16· cited 2×

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Smith v. Phillips
  Supreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 3,512×
• Hanna v. Plumer
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 2,853×
• McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood
  Supreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 1,407×
• Ross v. Oklahoma
  Supreme Court· 1988-08-25· cited 1,289×
• Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1958-06-23· cited 922×
• Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-02· cited 848×
• Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Aalco Wrecking Company, Inc., a Corporation
  Eighth Circuit· 1972-10-16· cited 159×
• E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc., E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc.
  Eighth Circuit· 1980-03-17· cited 150×
• Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-05-06· cited 101×
• Balder v. Haley
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-01-09· cited 96×
• Germann v. F.L. Smithe MacHine Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-11-14· cited 94×
• Coy R. GROGAN and John Henson, Appellees, v. Frank J. GARNER, Jr., Appellant
  Eighth Circuit· 1987-01-20· cited 90×
• United States v. George M. Khoury
  Eleventh Circuit· 1990-06-07· cited 81×
• Conti, Patricia and Conti, Richard, Husband and Wife v. Ford Motor Company and Winner Ford, J/s/a v. Richard Conti. Appeal of Ford Motor Company
  Third Circuit· 1984-10-12· cited 66×
• Halla Nursery, Inc. v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-05-11· cited 62×
• Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company v. Dallas D. Speth and Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation
  Eighth Circuit· 1968-12-12· cited 59×
• Kallio v. Ford Motor Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-06-05· cited 56×
• Ralph M. Johnson v. Niagara MacHine & Tool Works, a New York Corporation
  Eighth Circuit· 1981-12-22· cited 35×
• Carvalho v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-07-11· cited 34×
• Jerroll Johnson v. Stanley Hill
  Eighth Circuit· 1960-01-20· cited 32×