· 3/24/2009
Ramstack v. Department of Army
Citations
- 607 F. Supp. 2d 94
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23235
- 2009 WL 756976
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that for a Privacy Act claim, failure-to- exhaust is an affirmative defense for which the defendant bears the burden of pleading and proving
- “[Plaintiff] failed to send the requested information . . . [a]ccordingly, the court concludes that the plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies”
- “[Plaintiff] failed to send the requested information . . . [a]ccordingly, the court concludes that the plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies”
- applying Bowden to Privacy Act claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ricardo M. Urbina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.