Skip to main content
· 3/24/2009

Ramstack v. Department of Army

Citations

  • 607 F. Supp. 2d 94
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23235
  • 2009 WL 756976

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that for a Privacy Act claim, failure-to- exhaust is an affirmative defense for which the defendant bears the burden of pleading and proving
  • “[Plaintiff] failed to send the requested information . . . [a]ccordingly, the court concludes that the plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies”
  • “[Plaintiff] failed to send the requested information . . . [a]ccordingly, the court concludes that the plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies”
  • applying Bowden to Privacy Act claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ricardo M. Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.