Skip to main content
· 7/13/2010

Ramsey v. YAVAPAI FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER

Citations

  • 235 P.3d 285
  • 225 Ariz. 132
  • 568 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 10
  • 2010 Ariz. App. LEXIS 116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the reporting statute covers “causes of action arising from reporting and investigating child [] abuse”
  • noting that we generally do not consider arguments raised for the first time in a motion for reconsideration because the “prevailing party below is routinely deprived of the opportunity to fairly respond”
  • declining to consider an argument raised on appeal when the appellant only raised the issue for the first time in a motion for reconsideration and the appellees had been \deprived of the opportunity to respond\
  • “Generally, we do not consider arguments raised for the first time in a motion for reconsideration.”
  • appeals court generally does not consider arguments raised for first time in motion for reconsideration, in part because opposing party may have been “deprived of the opportunity to respond to these arguments”
  • in the context of motions for reconsideration, “when a new [constitutional] argument is raised for the first time . . . the prevailing party below is routinely deprived of the opportunity to fairly respond.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orozco, Johnsen, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.