Ninth Circuit· 9/19/1996
Ramsey v. Kantor
Citations
- 96 F.3d 434
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “if a federal permit is a prerequisite for a project with adverse impact on the environment, issuance of that permit does constitute a major federal action”
- challenge not capable of repetition “where an agency will be basing its rulings on different criteria or factors in the future”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Drakes Bay Oyster Company v. Sally JewellNinth Circuit· 2013-09-03· cited 366×
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Natural Resources Defense CounNinth Circuit· 2014-03-13· cited 207×
- Arizona Cattle Growers' Ass'n v. United States Fish & WildlifeNinth Circuit· 2001-12-17· cited 195×
- Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. FlowersTenth Circuit· 2004-03-02· cited 78×
- United States v. Chad Kirch McKittrickNinth Circuit· 1998-04-28· cited 61×
- Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict of Columbia· 2013-11-13· cited 49×
- Loggerhead Turtle v. County Council of Volusia County, FloridaEleventh Circuit· 1998-08-03· cited 38×
- Pub Util Cmsn St CA v. FERCD.C. Circuit· 2001-01-12· cited 29×
- Columbia Riverkeeper v. United States Coast GuardNinth Circuit· 2014-08-05· cited 27×
- Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. TidwellD. Oregon· 2010-06-04· cited 16×
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. SalazarE.D. California· 2010-12-14· cited 15×
- Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Bonneville Power AdministrationNinth Circuit· 1997-07-01· cited 14×
- Loggerhead Turtle v. County Council of Volusia CountyEleventh Circuit· 1998-08-03· cited 13×
- Anglers Conservation Network v. PritzkerDistrict of Columbia· 2014-09-30· cited 11×
- State of Alaska Department of v. Federal Subsistence BoardNinth Circuit· 2023-03-14· cited 10×
- California Trout, Inc. v. United States Bureau of ReclamationC.D. California· 2015-06-22· cited 8×
- Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict of Columbia· 2014-08-18· cited 7×
- Westlands Water District v. United States Department of the InteriorE.D. California· 2002-12-10· cited 4×
- South Yuba River Citizens League v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceE.D. California· 2009-05-05· cited 4×
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Administrator, Bonneville Power AdministrationNinth Circuit· 1999-05-10· cited 4×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- Greenpeace Action v. FranklinNinth Circuit· 1993-10-05· cited 245×
- Conner v. BurfordNinth Circuit· 1988-01-13· cited 244×
- Save the Yaak Committee, Donn Vance v. J.R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture R. Max Peterson, Chief, Forest Service Thomas Costin, Region I ForesterNinth Circuit· 1988-05-11· cited 223×
- United States v. OregonNinth Circuit· 1990-08-27· cited 174×
- Thomas v. PetersonNinth Circuit· 1985-02-11· cited 157×
- Sierra Club v. BabbittNinth Circuit· 1995-09-15· cited 129×
- Jones v. GordonNinth Circuit· 1986-06-18· cited 97×
- Mt. Graham Red Squirrel v. EspyNinth Circuit· 1993-03-03· cited 59×
- Port of Astoria v. HodelNinth Circuit· 1979-03-05· cited 58×
- Ramsey v. KantorNinth Circuit· 1996-09-19· cited 43×
- Idaho Department of Fish & Game v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceD. Oregon· 1994-03-28· cited 25×
- Almond Hill School v. United States Department Of AgricultureNinth Circuit· 1985-08-12· cited 17×
- California Trout v. SchaeferNinth Circuit· 1995-06-26· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.