Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 8/27/1996

Ramsey v. Coughlin

Citations

  • 94 F.3d 71
  • 1996 WL 481463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, though trial court may in some circumstances raise issue of summary judgment sua sponte, “[s]ummary judgment should not be granted . . . unless the losing party has been given an opportunity to demonstrate that there are genuine material issues for trial.”
  • noting that summary judgment is procedurally appropriate where the record reflects “the losing party’s inability to enhance the evidence supporting its position and the winning party’s entitlement to judgment”
  • in such a setting, “great care must be exercised to assure that the original movant has had an adequate opportunity to show that there is a genuine issue and that his [or her] oppo- nent is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graafeiland, Meskill, Winter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Ramsey v. Coughlin

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.