Ramsdell v. Ramsdell
Citations
- 47 Wash. 444
- 92 P. 278
- 1907 Wash. LEXIS 783
Syllabus
<p>Appeal—Review—Questions Reviewable. The appellant has a right to appeal on the judgment roll and question the sufficiency of the complaint and findings to support the judgment.</p> <p>Divorce—Pleading—Jurisdiction—Residence. An allegation of plaintiffs residence in this state for one year, and in the county at the time suit is brought, is essential to jurisdiction in an action for divorce.</p> <p>Appeal—Record—Bill oe Exceptions. Testimony not embodied in a bill of exceptions or statement of facts cannot be considered on appeal.</p> <p>Appeal—Review—Amendments—Divorce—Jurisdiction. Where the complaint and findings in an action for a divorce fail to show the residence of the plaintiff, and the evidence is not brought up on appeal, the complaint cannot be deemed amended to cure the defect, and a decree of divorce must be reversed for want of jurisdiction. '</p> <p>Divorce—Decree—Division of Propebtt. Upon granting a wife a divorce, the court may award all the property, community and separate, to the wife.</p> <p>Costs—On Appeal. Where defects might have been readily cured by amendment in the court below, and appellant 'did not call the court’s attention thereto, but had a right to first raise them on appeal, no costs will be allowed in the supreme court on reversing the judgment.</p>
Judges: Rudkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Carnahan v. CarnahanArizona Supreme Court· 1955-11-29· cited 9×
- Shively v. ShivelyOhio Court of Appeals· 1950-05-25· cited 9×
- Faulkner v. FaulknerWashington Supreme Court· 1916-03-01· cited 9×
- Powell v. PowellWashington Supreme Court· 1912-01-12· cited 6×
- Cotter v. CotterNinth Circuit· 1915-08-09· cited 6×
- Leaser v. LeaserWashington Supreme Court· 1909-05-11· cited 1×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fields v. FieldsWashington Supreme Court· 1891-06-15· cited 7×
- Luce v. LuceWashington Supreme Court· 1896-11-24· cited 6×
- Miller v. MillerWashington Supreme Court· 1905-05-01· cited 6×
- Clemans v. WesternWashington Supreme Court· 1905-07-22· cited 4×
- Mitchell v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court· 1905-08-02· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.