Ramsdell v. Erskine Bowles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 20 jury could find force unreasonable in part because Plaintiff had 21 “repeatedly” requested that handcuffs be loosened but officers 22 didn’t do so for 35 to 40 minutes
• finding prisoner’s suit for library access to be moot upon his 9 transfer to another prison
• acknowledging the district court’s “great leeway in the application and enforcement of its local rules”
• finding prisoner’s suit for library access to be moot upon his 9 transfer to another prison
• acknowledging district court’s “‘great leeway in the application and enforcement of its local rules’”
• noting district court’s “great leeway in the application and enforcement of its local rules”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).